Analisis Pola Aktivitas Belajar Mahasiswa pada Learning Management System Menggunakan Teknik Clustering
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/saturnus.v4i1.1365Keywords:
Activity Patterns, K-Means, Learning Analytics, LMS Analytics, Student ClusteringAbstract
The increasing use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) in higher education generates large amounts of student activity data that have the potential to provide deeper insights into learning processes. However, in practice, these data are still rarely analyzed systematically to understand variations in students’ learning activity patterns, limiting their practical use in supporting teaching and learning. This study aims to explore students’ learning activity patterns in an LMS using a clustering approach based on activity data.This research utilizes the publicly available Open University Learning Analytics Dataset (OULAD), focusing on a single course and a single academic term. LMS activity data were processed through data cleaning and feature extraction, followed by student clustering using the K-Means algorithm. The quality of the clustering results was evaluated using the Silhouette Score, and visual analysis was applied to support the interpretation of the results.The results indicate that students’ learning activities can be grouped into two main patterns, namely a group of students with high learning activity and a group with lower or moderate activity levels. These findings highlight the existence of heterogeneous learning behaviors among students, even within the same learning context.The identified learning activity patterns provide an initial foundation for utilizing LMS data to monitor student engagement and to support the development of more responsive, data-driven learning approaches in higher education.
References
Adam, A., Farell, G., Marta, R., & Asmara, D. (2025). Learning analytics terhadap perilaku akses digital mahasiswa pada learning management system Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal, 9, 30623–30630.
Ahmed, M., Seraj, R., & Islam, S. M. S. (2020). The k-means algorithm: A comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. Electronics, 9(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9081295
Aljaloud, A. S., Uliyan, D. M., Alkhalil, A., Elrhman, M. A., Alogali, A. F. M., Altameemi, Y. M., Altamimi, M., & Kwan, P. (2022). A deep learning model to predict student learning outcomes in LMS using CNN and LSTM. IEEE Access, 10, 85255–85265. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3196784
Ardianti, M., Nurhayati, O. D., & Warsito, B. (2024). Model prediksi kinerja siswa berdasarkan data log LMS menggunakan ensemble machine learning. JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi), 12(3), 562–571. https://doi.org/10.23887/jstundiksha.v12i3.59816
Ginting, S. (2025). EduTIK: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. EduTIK: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi, 2(5), 773.
Ikhsan, E. (2021). Penerapan K-means clustering dari log data Moodle untuk menentukan perilaku peserta pada pembelajaran daring. Sistemasi, 10(2), 414. https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v10i2.1285
Junthopas, W., & Wongoutong, C. (2025). Pre-determining the optimal number of clusters for k-means clustering using the parameters package in R and distance metrics. Applied Sciences, 15(21), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111372
Kharis, S. A. A., & Zili, A. H. A. (2022). Learning analytics dan educational data mining pada data pendidikan. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 6(1), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.061.02
Kuzilek, J., Hlosta, M., & Zdrahal, Z. (2017). Data descriptor: Open University learning analytics dataset. Scientific Data, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.171
Lima, G. D. O., Costa, J. A. R., Araújo, R. D., & Dorça, F. A. (2024). Exploring the relationship between students engagement and self-regulated learning: A case study using OULAD dataset and machine learning techniques. Proceedings, 1154–1165. https://doi.org/10.5753/sbie.2023.234344
Purwoningsih, T., Inayanto, W., & Yunus, M. (2023). Exploring learning analytics in e-learning: A comprehensive analysis of student characteristics and behavior. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh, 24(2), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.33830/ptjj.v24i2.5055.2023
Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. J. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK 2012), 252–254. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330661
Tresnawati, D., Septiana, Y., & Hidayatno, F. R. (2025). Pengukuran keterlibatan pelajar menggunakan learning analytics dan metode Kanban. Jurnal Algoritma, 22(2), 847–857. https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.22-2.2369
Zhang, J., Qiu, F., Wu, W., Wang, J., Li, R., Guan, M., & Huang, J. (2023). E-learning behavior categories and influencing factors of STEM courses: A case study of the Open University learning analytics dataset (OULAD). Sustainability, 15(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108235
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Saturnus: Jurnal Teknologi dan Sistem Informasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



