Analisis Komparatif Pemanfaatan Generative AI Gemini Dan Grok Dalam Pembuatan Konten Edukasi Visual Satreskrim Polresta Banyumas

Authors

  • R. Vitto Mahendra Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
  • Risko Nur Rizqi Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
  • Oktaviano Rifky Ramadhani Universitas Amikom Purwokerto
  • Dhanar Intan Surya Saputra Universitas Amikom Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/uranus.v4i2.1623

Keywords:

Gemini, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Grok, Satreskrim, Visual Education

Abstract

The rise in cybercrime in Indonesia has prompted law enforcement agencies to optimize their preventive communication strategies based on visual content. This study conducts a comparative analysis of the use of two generative artificial intelligence platforms—Gemini (Google DeepMind) and Grok (xAI)—in the production of visual educational content by the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Banyumas City Police. The methodology employed is a comparative experimental research approach using identical prompt instruments across two main scenarios: the prevention of motor vehicle theft and the prevention of online fraud. The evaluation was conducted based on three assessment dimensions: contextual relevance, production speed (response time), and content filtering mechanisms. The study’s findings indicate that Grok outperforms Gemini in terms of production speed, the depth of local identity representation, and visual quality tailored to social media audiences, while Gemini demonstrates superiority in the dimensions of formality and consistency of output for the context of official institutional communication. The implications of this research point toward a recommendation for a complementary approach in the synergistic use of both platforms in accordance with the specific communication needs of the Criminal Investigation Unit.

References

Anil, R., et al. (2023). Gemini: A family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.11805

Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2022). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control. Criminology & Public Policy, 17(1), 205–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12353

Cao, Y., et al. (2023). A comprehensive survey of AI-generated content (AIGC): A history of generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT. Journal of the ACM, 37(4). http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.04226

Erlyana, Y., & Saputra, M. G. (2026). Comparative study of generative AI tools in visual communication design education: Creativity and usability. JITK (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Komputer), 11(3), 733–742. https://doi.org/10.33480/jitk.v11i3.7087

Gultom, S. D. A., Koesbardiati, T., & Yuadi, I. (2025). Integrating generative AI into Society 5.0: A paradigm for sustainable education. Research and Development in Education, 5(1), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v5i1.40665

Jamal, S., Wimmer, H., & Rebman, C. M. (2024). Perception and evaluation of text-to-image generative AI models: A comparative study of DALL-E, Google Imagen, GROK, and Stable Diffusion. Issues in Information Systems, 25(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.48009/2_iis_2024_123

Joynt, V., et al. (2024). A comparative analysis of text-to-image generative AI models in scientific contexts: A case study on nuclear power. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-79705-4

Liang, P., et al. (2022). Holistic evaluation of language models. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.09110

Liu, W., & Kim, H. G. (2025). The visual communication using generative artificial intelligence in the context of new media. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96869-9

Matsiola, M., Lappas, G., & Yannacopoulou, A. (2024). Generative AI in education: Assessing usability, ethical implications, and communication effectiveness. Societies, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc14120267

Monib, W. K., Qazi, A., Apong, R. A., Azizan, M. T., De Silva, L., & Yassin, H. (2024). Generative AI and future education: A review, theoretical validation, and authors’ perspective on challenges and solutions. PeerJ Computer Science, 10, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2105

Rahmawati, M., Mahdiyah, M., Nisa, Z., Sabirin, M., & Mof, Y. (2026). Cognitive scaffolding and faith-based digital literacy: Integrating advanced organizer and YouTube in Islamic moral education. Al-Adzka: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 15(2), 246–256. https://doi.org/10.18592/aladzkapgmi.v15i2.18627

Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., & Ommer, B. (2022). High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 10674–10685. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.01042

Sholicha, I. D. A., & Sukmana, H. (2025). Digitalisasi layanan kepolisian: Studi tentang efektivitas dan kendala dalam penggunaan “Polri Super App” untuk pelayanan publik. Jurnal Noken Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 11(1), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v8i2.2444

Sitinjak, C., Ober, J., & Sakiewicz, P. (2025). Unlocking the potential: Transformative applications of generative AI in East Kalimantan’s educational landscape. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 44(3), 600–613. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v44i3.70169

Sutabri, T., Suroyo, H., & Kurniawan. (2025). Navigating the generative AI revolution in education: A systematic review of applications, ethical considerations, and future directions. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika, 14(2), 374–384. https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v14i2.90367

Syah, R. (2023). Strategi kepolisian dalam pencegahan kejahatan phising melalui media sosial di ruang siber. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 2(9), 864–870. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i9.3594

Taroreh, I. W. E., Rorimpandey, W. H. F., & Umboh, D. (2026). Pemanfaatan artificial intelligence (AI) dalam pembelajaran di era digital. ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 5(3), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v5i3.15870

Wiguna, D. P., Wicaksana, A. K., Syarifurrahman, I., & Habbi, F. (2025). Narasi visual infografis sebagai media literasi kesehatan masyarakat. CHESTER Art Design Journal, 60–69. https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/Chester/article/view/28800

Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the public sector—Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1498103

Yekta, M. M. J. (2024). The general intelligence of GPT–4, its knowledge diffusive and societal influences, and its governance. Meta-Radiology, 2(2), 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metrad.2024.100078

Zhao, K., Peng, C., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the teaching path of visual communication in the digital era. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.340937

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

R. Vitto Mahendra, Risko Nur Rizqi, Oktaviano Rifky Ramadhani, & Dhanar Intan Surya Saputra. (2026). Analisis Komparatif Pemanfaatan Generative AI Gemini Dan Grok Dalam Pembuatan Konten Edukasi Visual Satreskrim Polresta Banyumas. Uranus: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, Sains Dan Informatika, 4(2), 01–16. https://doi.org/10.61132/uranus.v4i2.1623

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.