Strengthening Rasch Modeling for Objective and Fair Assessment for Chemistry Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/bumi.v2i4.442Keywords:
chemistry teacher, rasch model, reinforcementAbstract
The competence of a good chemistry teacher will contribute to a fair assessment ability. This service aims to improve the professional competence of the sub-field of assessment for chemistry teachers at madrasahs in the Mranggen sub-district. This service is participatory by processing the results in a quantitative descriptive manner with one variable, namely the professional competence of the teacher's assessment. Service Locations in Madrasahs, Mranggen District. The number of participants in this service is 20 active chemistry teachers. Data collection techniques using closed and open questionnaires. Data validity uses content validity. Data reliability using Croncbach's Alpha technique. Data analysis techniques use the percentage formula to determine the achievement of each component through statistical data. The results of Community Service found that the professional competence of chemistry teachers at madrasas in the Mranggen sub-district was on average in the very good category, but variations in the use of assessment software were very lacking and had never been carried out. The service contribution gives a good value for changes in the ability to use the Rasch model assessment software after the service is over, but this depends on the amount of motivation the participants have.
References
Andrich, D. (1982). An extension of the Rasch model for ratings providing both location and dispersion parameters. Psychometrika, 47(1), 105-113.
Baghaei, P. (2012). The application of multidimensional Rasch models in large scale assessment and validation: An empirical example. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(1), 233-252.
Bariqi, M. D. (2018). Pelatihan dan pengembangan sumber daya manusia. Jurnal Studi Manajemen dan Bisnis, 5(2), 64-69.
Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (Eds.). (2012). Rasch models in health. John Wiley & Sons.
Darling, H. L. (2010). Evaluating teacher effectiveness: How teacher performance assessments can measure and improve teaching. Center for American Progress, 5(1), 65-72.
Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 21(3), 305-334.
Duffield, K. E., & Spencer, J. A. (2022). A survey of medical students’ views about the purposes and fairness of assessment. Medical Education, 36(9), 879-886.
Engelhard Jr, G. (2014). Examining rater errors in the assessment of written composition with a many-faceted Rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(2), 93-112.
Engelhard Jr, G., & Wang, J. (2014). Alternative measurement paradigms for measuring executive functions: SEM (formative and reflective models) and IRT (Rasch models). Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 12(3), 102-108.
Freund, R. J., Wilson, W. J., & Sa, P. (2006). Regression analysis. Elsevier.
Goldstein, H. (1979). Consequences of using the Rasch model for educational assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 5(2), 211-220.
Gonzalez, E., Garijo, D., & Corcho, O. (2022). Challenges for FAIR digital object assessment. Research Ideas and Outcomes, 8, e95943.
Harackiewicz, J. M. (1979). The effects of reward contingency and performance feedback on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1352.
Leung, C., & Mohan, B. (2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335-359.
Mešić, V., Neumann, K., Aviani, I., Hasović, E., Boone, W. J., Erceg, N., ... & Repnik, R. (2019). Measuring students’ conceptual understanding of wave optics: A Rasch modeling approach. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010115.
Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2017). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82-99.
Nisbet, I., & Shaw, S. D. (2019). Fair assessment viewed through the lenses of measurement theory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(5), 612-629.
Pepper, M. B., & Pathak, S. (2008). Classroom contribution: What do students perceive as fair assessment? Journal of Education for Business, 83(6), 360-368.
Ryan, R. M., Mims, V., & Koestner, R. (2018). Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: A review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(4), 736.
Unick, G. J., & Stone, S. (2020). State of modern measurement approaches in social work research literature. Social Work Research, 34(2), 94-101.
Weiner, M. J., & Mander, A. M. (2018). The effects of reward and perception of competency upon intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 2(1), 67-73.
Wu, M., & Adams, R. (2007). Applying the Rasch model to psycho-social measurement: A practical approach. Melbourne: Educational Measurement Solutions.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bumi : Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Sosialisasi Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
